Tag: innocent

Adnan Syed’s Undeserved Punishment

serial-s01-share
Serial podcast

Welcome, fellow bloggers, to my final post on Sungwoo’s Blog (for now)! Several days ago, I posted about the first episode of the Serial podcast, created and narrated by Sarah Koenig. To follow up on this topic, I just finished the final episode last night- it seriously got me hooked on murder mysteries! However, the more I listened, the more it got me thinking about Adnan Syed- and I fully believe that he is an innocent man, being wrongly convicted for Hae Min Lee’s death.

rs-247181-adnan-syed-gets-retrial-serial-podcast-murder
Adnan Syed behind bars

I’m very aware that it’s a bold statement- after all, Adnan is still in jail to this day (New York Post). The officials must have made the correct decision, right?

Wrong.

I firmly believe Adnan’s innocence and there are several reasons supporting my opinion. First of all,  Adnan had an obvious alibi at the time of Hae Min Lee’s death, around 3 pm on January 13th, 1999. Her name was Asia McClain- she was certain to have seen him at the Woodlawn Public Library with her, making it impossible for Adnan to be Hae’s killer. Asia had even written letters and an affidavit regarding this case; however,

asia-mcclain-letter-handwritten-1_0
Asia McClain’s letter to Adnan

Adnan’s late attorney Cristina Gutierrez failed to pursue the alibi, resulting in an inability to testify at trial. According to C. Justin Brown, “there is no more powerful defense than an alibi”- had Adnan’s trial attorney brought Asia in to testify, he would have been in position to be declared innocent by the court (New York Post). She was a very reliable alibi as well, as she was not “really close friends”with Adnan, as mentioned in the letter. I believe this suggests that Adnan did not plan with her beforehand just to create a false witness. She was just another classmate at the library, who is, to this day, certain about Adnan being elsewhere at the time of Hae’s death.

 

Furthermore, the only hard evidence the Baltimore police have of Adnan being guilty is Jay Wilds’ story. Jay was Adnan’s former best friend and classmate, whom he would “sometimes smoke weed with” (Rolling Stone). His testimony to the police regarded the afternoon when Hae went missing; he told them about how Adnan was planning to kill Hae, and that he would need Jay to pick him up after in his car. In my opinion, I don’t see Jay as a reliable source for this case; he was an older man who had already graduated from high school, and as mentioned, has a clear history with drug use. To

img_0328-feature-hero
Jay Wilds, former friend of Adnan

make matters worse for Jay, his testimony was constantly changing throughout his multiple police interviews and trials; he would do anything to make sure none of his actions would hint of him being guilty. Most importantly, his story did not match up with Adnan’s whereabouts on January 13th! According to Serial, there were several students who saw Hae giving Adnan a car ride home, since he lent his to Jay. This would mean that his entire story about the burial of the body at Leakin Park does not correspond to the whereabouts of Adnan at the same time. If this corrupt story is truly the only hard evidence, I strongly believe Adnan should not be considered guilty.

Above all, I just find it very hard to believe that a young, handsome, football player and “Homecoming King” would commit such a crime against an innocent ex-girlfriend. Throughout the finale of Serial, Sarah Koenig, the narrator, would often include audio clips of her and Adnan talking. From what I could hear, Adnan genuinely seemed to still care for Hae and was deeply in love with her, and it gives me a sense of doubt that he would be the one to strangle her. Conversely, there is a man, also from Baltimore, who might be capable of such brutal actions: Ronald Lee Moore.

ronald-lee-moore-2
Ronald Lee Moore’s mugshot

Ronald was a man who was convicted numerous times for burglary, which often included sexual assault, and murder. I was surprised to hear in the podcast that this man was held responsible for strangling a Korean girl- 27-year-old Annelise Hyang Suk Lee- right in Baltimore County. He was released from jail just two weeks before

annelise-hyang-suk-lee
Annelise Lee

January 13th, Hae’s disappearance (Heavy). I can’t imagine this being a coincidence; he had a small window of being out, and according to Serial, he was a very active criminal. Deirdre Enright from the podcast even says, “What makes more sense? That little seventeen-year-old, never been in trouble with the law Adnan killed someone or that Ronald Moore, rapist and murderer who got out of prison thirteen days before Hae disappeared, that he killed someone”? I agree with this statement entirely from Deirdre, as it would just be so unlikely that an innocent high school student would be the one to commit a similar type of murder to a real criminal, who was active during Hae’s disappearance.

Overall, there just isn’t enough evidence to prove that Adnan is guilty. With Asia McClain as his alibi, the inconsistencies from Jay’s testimony, and the case of a real murderer during the same time all point to the fact that Adnan is innocent. I must admit: I’m not a researcher, criminologist, or detective. On the other hand, if Sarah Koenig, after spending months on the case, says “the guy I knew, there’s no way he could have done this”, I’ll trust her instincts.

Works Cited

Adnan Syed behind bars. N.p. Rolling Stone. Web. 28 July 2017.

Annelise Hyang Suk Lee. N.p. Heavy. Web. 28 July 2017.Serial podcast cover. N.p. Serial Podcast. Web. 28 July 2017.

Asia McClain’s letter. N.p. Serial Podcast. Web. 28 July 2017.

Associated Press. “‘Serial’ Podcast Subject Adnan Syed Seeks New Trial in Murder Case.”New York Post. New York Post, 08 June 2017. Web. 28 July 2017.Jay Wilds. N.p. The Intercept. Web. 28 July 2017.

Koenig, Sarah. “Season one: episode 12 What We Know”. Audio blog post. Serial.

McDonell-Parry, Amelia. “‘Serial’ Subject Adnan Syed: 4 Key Pieces of Evidence.” Rolling Stone. Rolling Stone, 01 July 2016. Web. 28 July 2017.

Prince, S.J. “Ronald Lee Moore: 5 Fast Facts You Need To Know.” Heavy.com. N.p., 18 Dec. 2014. Web. 28 July 2017.

Ronald Lee Moore. N.p. Heavy. Web. 28 July 2017.

 

 

Jeannette Walls: An Innocent Child Amidst the Poverty and Struggles

For the last week or so, I have been reading a very intriguing memoir called The Glass Castle written by Jeannette Walls. The story is told from Jeannette’s perspective, as she undergoes many troubles with her struggling family, mostly due to her poor, incompetent parents that are constantly moving from place to place, making the kids never feel at home. To learn more about the story, click here. I did not expect the book to be so thrilling; there are unexpected surprises that pop up here and there! I look forward to watching the movie when it comes out in theatres.

Being halfway through the book, it is clear to see that several archetypes are present in the characters of The Glass Castle. In my opinion, the literary archetype that is best represented in a character is The Child, constantly being shown by young Jeannette.

71vbpx0qsml
The cover of The Glass Castle (Photo from Amazon)

I think it’s important that we are all on the same page as I begin this blog. First things first: what exactly is “The Child” archetype?

The Child, from a literary perspective, refers to a character of innocence that maintains purity and is always hopeful and optimistic, even in times of great catastrophe. Despite any evil or malice that can occur in their surrounding

jeannette-walls-19723841_banner
Jeannette Walls, author of The Glass Castle (Photo from Simon & Schuster Canada)

environment, the Child still manages to be carefree and uses the harsh experiences to grow up (Campbell, Candess M.). I like to think that in all of us, there is a child within that keeps us playful, innocent, and most importantly… immature!

As I started to delve into the plot more and more, I quickly realized how clear it was that Jeannette is portraying the archetype of the Child. Coming from a very poor family that is always moving from one cheap home to another, she should have lots to complain about. Her parents are always fighting, and have never had the money to feed the family well, to send her to school, or even to settle down in a nice city. Despite all this, Jeannette remains innocent and keeps optimistic throughout the memoir.

For example, Jeannette’s family suffers from severe poverty and struggles to have food on a daily basis. The lack of food and money in the house causes a massive fight between Rex, Jeannette’s father, and Rose Mary, her mother. With several death threats, physical abuse, and curse words, the fight comes to an end: “‘He tried to kill me,’ Mom sobbed. ‘Your father wants to watch me die.’ ‘I didn’t push her,’ Dad protested. ‘I swear to God I didn’t. She jumped.’ He was standing over Mom, holding out his hands, palms up, pleading his innocence. Lori stroked Mom’s hair and dried her tears. Brian leaned against the wall and shook his head. ‘Everything’s okay now,’ I said over and over again.” (Walls 72). Jeannette, even at the age of seven, is having to deal with family troubles at a serious level. However, she still finds the courage and energy to stay positive and loves the family that she was born to. I think only a true archetype of the Child can cope with such stress, as she simply says how “everything’s okay now”, as if none of the fighting had happened and she’s just glad that the family is back to as normal they can be again.

images
From left to right: Brian, Jeannette, Maureen and Lori Walls (Photo from Blogspot)

I think the author did an excellent job with the word choice. By making the rest of the family seem depressed, miserable, and ready to give up on their struggling life, Jeannette’s optimism shines like a diamond. This makes the idea of Jeannette being the Child archetype very effective and convincing to the readers.

I personally think a reason as to why Jeannette is always so optimistic and not worrying about money that much is because she has never really had any experience with the rich. Everywhere she has lived with her family, they were always surrounded by other families that were just as poor, if not worse. This would give Jeannette the false idea that the life they are living is normal, and she is able to live her life brightly and carefree, representing the Child perfectly.

A second strong piece of evidence for Jeannette being the Child that I found happens on yet another low point in the Walls’ lives. Rex, determined to put an end to his drinking, decides that a family road trip to the Grand Canyon would help everyone’s cause. Unfortunately, upon trying to impress Jeannette by driving extremely fast, the car breaks down. Frustration hangs upon the family like a cloud, but has no effect on the Child Jeannette: “Lori gave me a disgusted look, as if she thought it was my fault that the car had broken down. ‘Why do you always encourage him?’ she asked. ‘Don’t worry,’ I said. ‘Dad will fix it.'” (Walls 119-120). Lori, being the oldest daughter, knows deep down that they will be stranded in the middle of nowhere with that broken-down car of theirs. However, the Child archetype in Jeannette does not fail to keep positive, as she has complete confidence in her father’s abilities to fix the car and get them underway again to the Grand Canyon. Jeannette does not bother herself with the fact that her family is too poor to afford a properly functioning car, or the fact that her siblings and parents are all on verge of losing it.

dad-baby
Rex Walls with his daughter Jeannette (Photo from Rimedia)

I think the author does a very good job once again portraying the Child archetype, as she makes young Jeannette seem playful, hopeful and purely optimistic. Despite the catastrophes that seem to follow the family around, Jeannette always manages to be bright and unnerving. I believe with this spirit, her mood will never be dampened with any issues that seem to trouble the rest of the Walls very greatly.

I couldn’t help but notice the use of symbolism in the memoir to show the archetypal Child in Jeannette. In the book, the Walls family moves out to the Mojave Desert after a brief stay at San Francisco. Rose Mary, being an artist, is fascinated by a weird-shaped tree called the Joshua Tree and paints several variations of it. This tree grows in all sorts of shapes and different directions, making it seem ugly and unnatural, and is only found in the Mojave Desert (Desert USA).

jt_03_04
The Joshua Tree (Photo from Desert USA)

Despite this bent-out-of-shape structure, Rose Mary still finds immense beauty in its crookedness, much to Jeannette’s confusion: “Mom frowned at me. ‘You’d be destroying what makes it special,’ she said. ‘It’s the Joshua tree’s struggle that gives it its beauty.'” (Walls 38). I believe the Joshua tree symbolizes how withstanding struggles and fighting through the pain will result in beauty for others to be in awe of. Jeannette has been going through many problems with her family since a young child; however, she still manages success in the end, as she now has more money than she could’ve imagined as child and lives in Park Avenue in New York City (Walls 4-5). This tree is a perfect symbol for the Child as it must withstand struggles and harsh climates for its whole childhood, and yet it manages to grow up to provide beauty and show strength to others. I believe the author explained the tree in such detail, hoping that readers will catch on and realize the importance of this symbol in the novel. It is a clear representation of the Child archetype that I could not miss.

Jeannette Walls depicts the archetype of the Child perfectly through the actions and feelings of her childhood self. By withstanding personal struggles coming from the Walls family and keeping a positive mood at all times, she was able to grow up and achieve success in the future. The same can be said for the Joshua tree, which in my opinion is a clear symbol for the same archetype; despite growing in different directions and being bent out of shape, it still manages to be beautiful in the end.

Thanks guys, I hoped you enjoyed my second ever blog post! I’m sure there’s more to come…

Sungwoo Chang

Works Cited

Walls, Jeannette. The Glass Castle. New York. Scribner, 2006. Print.

Campbell, Candess M. “The Child Archetype.” Energy Medicine DNA. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 July 2017.

“The Glass Castle Summary.” GradeSaver: Getting You the Grade. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 July 2017.

DesertUSA.com. “Joshua Tree.” Joshua Tree – Yucca Brevifolia – DesertUSA. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 July 2017.